Saturday, July 4, 2009

Today's guest blogger. My brother Fred from the NEA RA

Hey bro,

I want to share with you some of my impressions of the NEA RA and try and respond to some of your questions.

1. What's different this year?

The main thing that's different is Barack Obama.

A lot of the hot button issues when we had Bush as president have a different meaning with Obama in the White House. The attitude towards charters is the most obvious, although not the only one. Perceived with little differentiation as an anti-union, anti- public school strategy under Bush, the simplest response that made the most sense was to simply say no. Now the discussion is more nuanced. New Business Item A, the main position statement on charters is an 8 point directive on how to collaborate on developing charters, rather than a plan of opposition to them. It was approved by the body overwhelmingly.

2. About the reaction to Duncan's speech. What does it signify?

Some education bloggers, including those who are here and some who are not, heard boos to some of Duncan's comments and got their pants all twisted around. There were some boos of course. But in plenty of conversations outside the hall, the reaction was considerably friendly and open. I found this was almost universally true among minority teachers. Remember, Obama got booed when he spoke at the RA in Philadelphia during the primary campaign and the NEA members voted for him in huge numbers.

Outside the hot house of wonker debates, and away from Chicago, where we have had
experience with Duncan's leadership, the Duncan approach works pretty well.

His personal story about his mom, and the success stories of the lives she touched, is a powerful one, particularly if you haven't heard it dozens of times before.

Again, there is the issue of context. As one observer said to me, a Bush EdSec could have come into the hall and given the same speech and the place would have gone up in flames (of course, no Bush EdSec ever did or ever would).

But Duncan can talk about pay-for-performance, teacher accountability, charter schools and even testing and get an entirely different reaction. He can do it because of Obama. Teachers know Obama isn't an anti-union guy, and Duncan says it in a way that implies respect for union input and voice. Nobody in the Bush USDE ever did that.

3. Will the NEA jump into charter organizing.

I can't tell if they are willing to put the resources, organizers and money into it that it requires. But they now have permission from the rank-and-file. That's new.

4. Why do I complain about my seats? Because it's funny. And true.

Two things you don't hear around the hall: Not much about the economic crisis. Nothing about the wars.

See you soon.



  1. Hey,
    Just a reminder that more of my reports from the NEA RA can be found at

  2. The charter school movement still emphasizes pushing out veteran teachers and replacing them with bright-eyed (and cheap) young beginners who are willing and able to work 12-hour days. The implication is still that veterans are deadwood and that "problem teachers" and "the dance of the lemons" are the main obstacle to education reform. It doesn't sound like Duncan or Obama have made any gesture that deviates from that attitude. So how is the NEA comfortable with that -- or is my perception about that attitude incorrect?

    And on that topic, I'm still not getting why Green Dot is viewed as labor-friendly. They got a majority of teachers at troubled Locke High School in LAUSD to sign a statement calling for turning the school over to Green Dot -- and then made all those teachers reapply for their jobs, and didn't rehire most of them. The L.A. Times coverage makes it very clear that the school is largely relying on those same bright-eyed beginners, working 12-hour days.

    My family is a longtime Newspaper Guild (now Media Workers) family. I was present at the January 2009 union meeting at which my husband's colleagues, some of them weeping, voted away their seniority rights in an effort to save the San Francisco Chronicle. I understand the complexities firsthand. But I just don't see how the attitude that veterans are deadwood and inexperienced beginners are superior teachers can be viewed as pro-labor, or as beneficial to education either.

  3. I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


  4. Nice to know your blog is getting some play up there.


Agree? Disagree? Let me hear from you.