Tuesday, March 30, 2021

Chauvin's murder conviction should be an easy one. But it won't be.

Chauvin (right) with his defense attorney, Eric Nelson. 

“Today starts a landmark trial that will be a referendum on how far America has come in its quest for equality and justice for all."
-- Floyd family attorney, Ben Crump

 From Tamir Rice to Michael Brown to Eric Garner, a long series of non-indictments in high-profile killings of Black men and women make plain that prosecutions of police officers are rare, and convictions rarer still. -- Bloomberg Law 

Derek Chauvin's defense argument is that George Floyd actually died from previous health issues and from being under the influence, rather than from the 9-minute and 29-second intentional strangulation administered by Chauvin and fellow officers, in broad daylight, on video for all the world to see. Even when told by a paramedic that Floyd no longer had a pulse, the Chauvin kept his knee pressing down on Floyd's neck.

This should be the quickest and easiest murder prosecution/conviction in history. But it won't be. Why? Because, 1) while America occasionally may extend some justice to black victims of police brutality, convicting a white cop of murdering an unarmed Black man is as rare an occurrence as a Donald Trump truth-telling, and 2) it's not just Chauvin who is on trial in that Minneapolis courtroom, but the entire system of American racial (in)justice. 

If cold-blooded killer Chauvin can't be held accountable, who can?


  1. Yes sadly it's going to be an uphill fight.

  2. We can't let them put the victim on trial. Their favorite trick.


Agree? Disagree? Let me hear from you.