Talking real reform

Soon-to-be AFT Union Prez. Randi Weingarten, is sounding like the reincarnation of Al Shanker. She’s talking real school reform—charters with union teachers, and fully-resourced, community-based schools. Just what Obama's campaign needs to hear.

Says NYT’s Sam Dillon:

In the speech Ms. Weingarten is to deliver Monday, she praises the ideas of a group of Democrats led by Tom Payzant, the former schools superintendent in Boston, who have argued that schools alone cannot close achievement gaps rooted in larger economic inequalities, and that “broader, bolder” measures are needed, like publicly financed early childhood education and health services for the poor.

Her weaknesses also match Shanker’s. Back then, he broke with the power elite on union organizing and teacher empowerment, but stayed tied to them in support for the Vietnam War and in his backwards response to 1968 black revolt. Weingarten showed similar bias when she caved in to pressures from divisive anti-Arab factions in the removal of principal Debbie Almontaser from the Kahlil Gibran International Academy.

Dillon is perceptive enough to recognize the “fierce debate among Democrats seeking to influence the educational program of Senator Barack Obama.” Weingarten comes down clearly on the side of the “bolder, broader group” as opposed to the Klein/Sharpton group, which places all the weight of school reform wholly on the schools.

Blog Notes

Did I embarrass Russo into finally saying something about Obama’s clear opposition to school vouchers in speeches to the NEA and AFT? How else to explain this snide, rear-end-covering comment?

*****

It’s the “Minister of Truth” (Chris Cerf) vs. Manhattan Institute’s Sol Stern over at Eduwonk. Each accuses the other of lying with statistics. Could they both be liars? Stay tuned.

“The surge is working…” and “I’ll still respect you in the morning.”

Three biggest lies ever told: 1) the check’s in the mail; 2) I’ll still respect you…; and 3) the surge is working.

The John McCain surge strategy succeeded only in overextending and stretching U.S. military and support lines in Iraq. Now there’s not enough troop strength to battle Taliban forces in Afghanistan. It looks like Bush/Cheney/Patraeus will be forced to pull troops out of Iraq at an even faster rate than that promised by Obama leaving McCain’s commitment to 100 years in Iraq a silly pipe dream. On top of that, the U.S has lost it friend Musharraf and its credibility in Pakistan. What do you think the military brass will have to say to Obama, Hagel and friends when they pay a visit? Open up another front with Iran? No way.

But will that slow down the coming Israeli attack on Tehran? Probably not.

Ed '08...vouchers...NEA...Obama

Pitting education issues vs. the war--a trick bag

I must admit, I saw this coming as soon as Bill Gates and Eli Broad put up $60 million for their Ed in’08, campaign, supposedly to make “education” the number-one issue in the elections. Roy Romer, coming off of his unimpressive, do-nothing tenure as L.A. school superintendent, and Karl Rove lieutenant, Mark Lampkin, were put in charge of the campaign and predictably, it was all show and no go.

First of all, the campaign has no substance. What does education in the abstract mean to millions of voters? What about education? They’ve kept their agenda pretty well hidden.

Secondly, how could ed reform possibly be pitted against the war in Iraq or the worsening economic crisis here at home, as an isolated campaign issue? We all know that the cost of the war has had a devastating effect on public education. Was this simply a trick bag, an attempt to skirt the war issue-- the Republicans’ Achilles Heel? Now it appears so.

While Romer remains virtually invisible, former Oklahoma Republican Rep. J.C. Watts, has become the new front man for Ed in ‘o8 . His strategy seems to be—pit education against the war as THE focus issue for the candidates.

Watts, a darling of the neocons, went from being a college footballer to a cheerleader for the war. He once claimed that war opponents like Sen. Feingold, were “always on the side of the terrorists.”

He sure wasn’t a big school reformer back then, opting instead for support of school vouchers and privatization. Now that the vast majority of Americans oppose the war, Watts is claiming that “voters rank the economy and education as more important than the war in Iraq.”

Watts reveals his real intent, using the usual code language for vouchers--union bashing (his friend McCain won’t even mention the V-word on the campaign trail).

"A Democratic nominee will have to be willing to take teachers' unions places they're not willing to go," said Watts.

Although he never mentions vouchers, we all know which "places" Watts wants them to go.

Bloggers suddenly quiet on Barack & vouchers

Obama made it clear once again, in his speech to the NEA, that he wasn’t going to “take the union” down that road. Anti-union bloggers tried to make much of scattered boos Obama received when he mentioned merit pay. But teachers who were at the meeting told me that way too much was made of it. The program Obama supports is pretty much the same as that supported by the union leadership.

Funny thing—remember all those bloggers, looking for a split between Obama and the union, who carefully perused each line in Barack’s interview with a Milwaukee paper, and then reported over and over again that the candidate was “open to vouchers”?

I’m talking about Joe Williams, Whitney Tilson, Alexander Russo, David Hoff, and Michelle McNeil. Not one of them even mentioned Obama’s statement in opposition to vouchers, in their coverage of the NEA meeting.

Why not?

Can they handle the truth?

Last year they organized a “hit squad ” to silence critics like Diane Ravitch. Now they’ve organized a “truth squad” to go after critical bloggers. Shouldn’t New York’s DOE have at least done that in reverse order? I mean, don't you find the "truth" first and then contract the hit?

Here’s Eduwonkette (“Gimme Some Truth”).

Good riddance to Edison Schools

Edison Schools is no more, reports Edweek. They've changed their name to EdisonLearning and shifted into the software business. It's just another sign of what a flop they've been and doesn't bode well for the rest of the school privateers.

From Quick and the Ed:

Edison's competitors haven't fared much better. Of the dozen or so other substantial for-profit school management companies that sprung up in the 1990s, most have disappeared, switched to non-profit status, or are limping along. Only one or two companies are profitable and they haven't expanded as far or as fast as expected.

“At least you know where he stands…”

Here’s the latest bit of feint praise for McCain coming out of conservative spinners these days: “Right or wrong, at least you always know where McCain stands.” Actually, this “maverick” turned McBush, has to Google himself to know where he stands. But still the spin continues.

Mitt Romney on MSNBC: “John McCain, you know where he is…”

Then there’s Mike Huckabee’s defense of the late (what took so long?) Jesse Helms:

“He didn’t care what you thought about his view, but you were going to always know where he stood because he stood for something and he stood clearly.

Yes, and the one thing you could say about Hitler…

Is Finn a hater?

Will one of you Fordham guys please tell Checker (right) to chill?

Fordham’s Checker Finn hates the government:

I've hung around Washington for the better part of four decades and have never seen so total a breakdown of competence, will, and common purpose. Consider, just for starters: immigration, Medicare, Darfur, national debt, NCLB, climate change, Tibet, infrastructure.

He hates young people and their damn blogs, feelings and opinions:

…nobody I know under 30 much bothers either with newspapers or radio/TV news. The oddments of current affairs that they pick up arrive via internet and, increasingly, the "blogosphere," which is more about feelings and opinions than basic information or sustained analysis.

He hates diversity:

When you fixate long enough on oneself, on "diversity" and on "sensitivity," what makes us different from each another eventually trumps what makes us similar.

He even hates Starbucks (at least, it gives him pause):

Starbucks, in a way, symbolizes both the best of American ingenuity and entrepreneurialism and the hedonistic, live-for-today, save-not-for-tomorrow, bread-and-circuses "life-style" that gives me pause about the future.

What does Checker like? The ultra-right-wing Bradley Foundation and its latest report.

Plunder Dome—again?

Chileans protest school privatization

REUTERS/Ivan Alvarado

Everything's hitting the fan in Santiago, Chile. Hundreds of students and teachers protesting a bill which, they say, could lead to privatization of public education, have been arrested in clashes with riot police using water canons and tear gas. The crisis threatens the regime of liberal president Michelle Bachelet.

*****

NEA's Convention

I was going to write something about the NEA's conference and the crazy spin put on Obama's speech by the usual pack of union-hating bloggers—you know, the DFER's Joe Williams, hedge-fund operator Whitney Tilson, and of course Andrew Rotherham. But since Leo Casey and my brother Fred already opened up a can of butt-whup on them, I'll defer to those two union leaders.

I'll just add one point. Williams and Co. never mention Obama's strong rejection (again) of school vouchers, in his NEA speech. Gee, I wonder why? Remember when Williams tried to make Obama into a voucherite?

No wonder he hates unions

Last year in response to Williams' benefactor, hedge-fund operator turned school entrepreneur, Tilson, I explained what happens when charter schools meet the Ownership Society . Tilson then tried to make light of the fact that there was profit to be made in the charter school business. Remember how Tilson mocked the notion?

Yeah, that's right, the charter school business is so profitable that I'm telling all my friends in the hedge fund business that they're in the wrong business. My message: "If you really want to make a lot of money, start a charter school!" LOL!

Now Philadelphia, where Paul Vallas opened wide the door for privately-managed charters, offers us another vivid example of how the school hustle works. This time It's about the Philadelphia Academy Charter School and it's no joke:

Federal authorities and Philadelphia School District officials began investigating the school and its nonprofit in the spring over alleged mismanagement, nepotism, and conflicts of interest involving Brien N. Gardiner, a former elementary school principal who founded both entities, and Kevin M. O'Shea, the charter school's former chief executive officer.The charter school's nonprofit, led by O'Shea's wife, Jamie, has received more than $2.4 million in taxpayer funds in rent payments since 2005, state records show.

Plunder Dome

Then there's Rhode Island's new mayoral academies. Scheduled to open next year, these academies have the potential to become legalized patronage handouts to developers and private management companies—a legacy of George Bush's Ownership Society. While the legislation doesn't give the mayors total control over their local school systems, a la New York and Chicago, it does give them the power, during their brief 2-year stints, to subcontract schools and leverage real estate deals to politically friendly companies.

Maybe Providence ex-Mayor Buddy Cianci can find a way back into the game, now that he's out of prison (remember Operation Plunder Dome?) and back in business.

Edweek points out a big advantage for Rhode Island privateers in the new legislation:

Unlike the state's existing charter schools, mayoral academies would get exemptions from state provisions on teacher pay and benefits. They would not be required to follow the state's "prevailing wage" and retirement statutes for teachers or rules on teacher seniority and tenure.

What's in their wallet?

The Times-Picayune reports that principals are dropping like flies at a New Orleans network of privately managed charter schools. Three of the four network's principals and all four assistant principals have just been fired.

The overhaul represents tremendous turnover for the network of three charter schools operated by the University of New Orleans College of Education and Human Development, and a fourth school operated in partnership with the local state-run district. The leadership changes have unsettled some teachers and parents, according to former administrators at the schools who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The name of that charter school network? Capital One-University of New Orleans Charter Network. Capital One Financial Corporation is a Fortune 500 financial holding company and the largest independent issuer of Visa and MasterCard. They paid $1 million to get their name on these schools. It's a sweet deal--a lot cheaper than a bowl game sponsorship.

The company, whose stock was clobbered by its association with the sub-prime lending scandal finally had to jettison its mortgage company, GreenPoint, because of pressure from investors.

What a perfect partner for post-Katrina charters. Hope these principals know what’s in their wallets.

Speaking of Austin Poly...

...one of their students, 15-year-old Yasmin Acree, is missing. She hasn’t been heard from since January. Nobody who knows Yasmin thinks she ran away. Instead, foul play is suspected. Why haven’t you heard much about Yasmin’s case? Why hasn’t it been all over the national media like the cases of white, suburban women like Stacy Peterson and Lisa Stebic? That’s the question Mary Mitchell asks in today’s Sun-Times column.

A thorn in the side...

One of the best bloggers, Eduwonkette, is the subject of Elizabeth Green’s N.Y. Sun piece, An Anonymous Education Blogger Becomes Thorn in City's Side.” It seems, Kette has become a real pain-in-the-ass for Bloomberg/Klein in N.Y. Green quotes Rotherham taking his usual paper-thin jab at the anonymous one. Green also mentions me, along with Bill Ayers and Sol “It’s all politics” Stern, as past Kette’s guest bloggers.

She[Eduwonkette] has excoriated Mr. Klein's signature small-schools initiative, under which large, failing high schools are split into smaller new schools, as a "bulldozer" that has displaced students with special needs.

Russo fantasizes. A Kette wannabee.

*****

Barry Crimmins wishes the late Bill Kunstler a happy 89^th birthday. Me too.

*****

Seems like every time John McCain opens his mouth, bloggers jump for joy. This time it’s Matthew Yglesias (“John McCain hates me”) having fun at McCain’s expense after his “I hate bloggers” flub. Oh joy!

Another look at Chicago's Austin Poly

Austin Poly Principal Bill Gerstein

American Prospect’s Ezra Klein takes another look at Chicago’s Austin Poly High School, a progressive small school that is seen by its founders as part of a strategy to save Chicago’s manufacturing base. Klein links to a more in-depth look at the school over at Progress Illinois. Principal Bill Gerstein says:

“Students who chose our school are choosing it for a lot of factors,” he says. “The safety is a big issue; quality of the teachers is a big issue. Location in the community where they live is a big thing. The career focus, we want to make that a much bigger reason why students chose our school. I think it’s a reason, but not as big as we’d like it right now.”

Last week's quotables

From Condoleezza Rice—“I’m proud” we invaded Iraq

From Manhattan Institute's Sol Stern--"I guess it's all politics, Leo"

“I’m not enough of a historian to wade into that issue”—Fordham’s Eric Osberg, in response to Thomas Sowell’s absurd claim that the teachers unions were responsible to Hitler’s victory in France.

Best quote this week comes from no less than Barack Obama on Huffington, trying to explain to critical supporters, why he voted for the FISA legislation, which gives federal immunity for com companies who illegally spied on the public:

I learned long ago, when working as an organizer on the South Side of Chicago, that when citizens join their voices together, they can hold their leaders accountable. I'm not exempt from that. I'm certainly not perfect, and expect to be held accountable too. I cannot promise to agree with you on every issue. But I do promise to listen to your concerns, take them seriously, and seek to earn your ongoing support to change the country.

Yes, it's pretty thin. But it shows that he has to pay attention and be accountable to his base when that base acts powerfully, the way we should.

Just so we remember what we're up against, I'm reminded of Dick Cheney, who responds differently to criticism. Remember when Cheney was told that recent polls show about two-thirds of Americans opposing the war in Iraq , he basically replied, “f**k ‘em if they can’t take a joke.”

Bigot or patriot?

Parting words from racist, gay-hater Jesse Helms

"White people, wake up before it is too late. Do you want Negroes working beside you, your wife and your daughters, in your mills and factories?" (1950)

"The Negro cannot count forever on the kind of restraint that's thus far left him free to clog the streets, disrupt traffic, and interfere with other men's rights." (1963)

"Crime rates and irresponsibility among Negroes are a fact of life which must be faced." (1981)

"The University of North Carolina (UNC)... the University of Negroes and Communists..." (1995)

"Blacks, gays and lesbians are responsible for the proliferation of AIDS"

"There is not one single case of AIDS in this country that cannot be traced in origin to sodomy." (1988)

"All Latins are volatile people." (1986)

"The New York Times and Washington Post are both infested with homosexuals themselves. Just about every person down there is a homosexual or lesbian."

From President Bush:

"Jesse Helms was a kind, decent, and humble man and a passionate defender of what he called 'the Miracle of America.' So it is fitting that this great patriot left us on the Fourth of July…"a stalwart defender of limited government and free enterprise, a fearless defender of a culture of life, and an unwavering champion of those struggling for liberty."

From John McCain:

"Let us remember a life dedicated to serving this nation."

Small Schools: Public School Reform Meets the Ownership Society

A review

Clive Harber is a prof at the University of Birmingham, England. He's written a great review of our book. It's published in the latest issue of Teachers College Record.

The title of the series in which this book is published is “Education, Politics and Culture” which suits the lively and politically committed content very well. Fundamentally, the book is about how a progressive educational movement aimed at facilitating smaller and more democratic urban schools in America became hijacked by the neo-conservative agenda of the Bush administration and its many powerful allies. In so doing it cannot fail to tackle the wider educational and political issues of the last eight years and their antecedents, which it does with admirable clarity and detail... Read the rest of the review, here.

Obama reiterates

"Troops out in 16 months"





Technorati Profile

It's Independence Day

And what country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? --Thomas Jefferson

The gadflies are buzzing about "patriotism" again

The teacher-basher title is up for grabs over at Flypaper blog where they’ve decided that it’s their 4th of July, patriotic duty to attack teachers unions. The Fordham neocons rightly concede the bashing championship to National Review wing-nut Thomas Sowell who blames “unpatriotic” teachers for Hitler’s victory in France. Then superfly Eric Osberg makes it worse, confessing, “I’m not enough of a historian to wade into that issue."

Hey Osberg! Please don’t blame your teachers. Read a damn book once in a while. After all, Sowell’s not much of an historian either. You’ll notice his quote about blaming the teachers union for fascism is not attributable to anyone. It’s actually all part of the neocon’s current ideological campaign starting with Jonah Goldberg’s book, Liberal Fascism, to rewrite history and equate Hitler and fascism with the left.

The French left, for those who don’t read, led the resistance movement against the fascists during WWII—and against France’s own right-wing, “patriotic” Vichy puppet government. That regime was led by Field Marshal Petain, a “patriotic” WWI hero who wound up collaborating with the Nazis and depriving French citizens of all their hard earned democratic rights.

Hmmm.

N.Y. small schools—Can they survive?

This good-news small schools story ran yesterday in the NYT. It raises an interesting question —can success at small schools like the Law & Justice Academy, be sustained?

To hear the tales of the new graduates is to understand the enormous effort and amount of resources it takes to make a school succeed. Teachers and other staff members routinely work 60 hours a week. Millions of extra dollars have been collected in grants and private donations. Parents and students regularly attend workshops until 10 p.m.

Someone's burning out

*****

BTW, who is this Martin Klonsky (must be a relative) and why is the Hillary Clinton Forum saying such terrible things about him?

Education is what survives...

I’m always getting pitches from consulting firms with names like The Something Group, asking me to review a film, book or video for their clients and help get their names into the blogosphere. The latest was Laura from the Rosen Group asking me to watch a video from the Aspen Ideas Festival. What I really wanted to ask Laura is--how come I never get invited to Aspen? It seems to be the place where only the executive wing of education reform hangs out, with some corporate sponsor picking up the heavy tab. Does that answer my previous question? Yes, it does.

Don't get me wrong. I love Aspen and the beautiful Colorado Rockies. The old mining town used to be a place where writers, artists and hippies roamed. Now you're more likely to find Michael Eisner, Victoria Beckham, or Prince Bandar. I wonder what a hotel room in Aspen costs these days? Probably no place for an urban teacher to come and have her/his voice heard at the Ideas Festival. But I digress.

The topic of the video and of Atlantic Magazine’s Aspen panel discussion was intriguing—“Is higher education for everyone?" The three powerhouse panelists were: Dan Mote, President, University of Maryland; Paul Verkuil, Former President, College of William and Mary; and Michael Bennet, Superintendent of the Denver Public School System.

Bennet, the only public school educator on the panel, never even gets one word in during the entire video. Why was he even there? His hair was perfect. But his comments would have been most interesting since he runs a district that sees a small percentage of its students get a 4-year college degree.

Neither of the other two had anything meaningful to contribute. Too bad, because these two guys are in some way really part of the problem. They each run, or ran, big universities—one public and the other private—which have priced themselves out of the market for almost anyone who isn’t a millionaire’s kid or willing to face a lifetime of heavy debt.

The video offers no debate, no discussion, no new insights into the question it poses. Mote and Verkuil each try and sound clever at times with old-boy ed-chatter. Verkuil, described on the video as former CEO of the American Automobile Association, is actually a pretty progressive guy. He's been an outspoken critic of privatization mania under the Ownership Society and wrote a pretty good book on the topic.

But in the video, he offers none of that. Instead, he uses one of my favorite quotes from behaviorist B.F. Skinner: "Education is what survives when what has been learned has been forgotten,” for no apparent reason, and then he mistakenly attributes it to Albert Einstein, proving Skinner’s quote to be perfectly appropriate.
Thanks, Laura, for wasting 8 minutes and 20 seconds of my life.

Progressive blogger shot in D.C.

TPM reports that Brian Beutler, a well-known progressive blogger, was shot and seriously injured during a mugging last night in Washington, D.C.

One bullet damaged Beutler's spleen, and he had it removed during surgery this morning at the Washington Hospital Center. He's expected to make a "pre-trauma" recovery, which is to say, a completely full recovery.

The shooting was confirmed to us by Tracy Van Slyke, the project director of the Media Consortium, a network of leading progressive news organizations (TPM is a member) for which Beutler is the Washington correspondent.

Read more...

Quotables

This comes from Sun-Times sports columnist Rick Telander re. former Chicago Simeon High School basketball star Derrick Rose, the Bulls number-one draft pick:

In 2007 in Chicago, 32 school-age children were killed by gunfire. This year there have been 28 killed so far, with the youngest being a 7-year-old girl, waiting for an afternoon snack at a fast-food drive-through with her father. Gang killers are pretty bad shots, you know, so in places like Rose's Englewood neighborhood, nobody's really safe from the crossfire, not even on your own porch or in your own bedroom, unless its walls are metal-sheathed. Poverty is at the root of it all, of course. And the ease of getting guns.

'I'm tired of walking into classrooms where there's an empty desk and trying to talk to children and comfort them and make them feel better,'' Arne Duncan, the chief executive of the Chicago Public Schools, recently told the New York Times.

I give Duncan credit for at least taking some responsibility for these CPS students and for speaking out about guns.

*****

"It's all politics..."

From new-McCarthyite and neocon think-tanker (Manhattan Institute) Sol Stern responding to the UFT's Leo Casey, calling the union a shill for Obama and calling me a "good friend of the UFT" (which I am).

I can’t help concluding that the reason you launched this factually unsupported attack on me, is that the union is now shilling for Obama, as it previously shilled for Clinton. You still haven’t explained why you never said a word about the Clinton campaign’s overt efforts to link Obama with Ayers’ terrorist past, but then decided to dredge up an old article of mine which never even came close to making that link. I guess it’s all politics Leo, and politics makes for strange bedfellows. In that regard I see that one of your new boosters in this argument is none other than that good friend of the UFT, Mike Klonsky. Don’t you think Al would be turning over in his grave?

The Al, for the uninitiated, is the late Al Shanker, who probably IS turning over in his grave seeing his old buddy Stern in bed with the worst of the union busters. As far as the racist theorist Charles Murray is concerned (referred to in Stern's response to Leo Casey), he's a fellow, along with Stern, at the Manhattan Institute. I love Stern calling an election campaign, "all politics."

Is the campaign really about ME?

Gee, I bet you thought that this presidential campaign was about issues like the war in Iraq or the devastating economic crisis. Maybe you thought rising fuel prices or education reform were important. Or maybe you even thought electing the country's first black president meant something. Well guess what? You're wrong This campaign is really about ME. That's right, ME--Mike Klonsky and whether or not the candidates know ME (move over Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright).

At least that's the way low-life blogger Steve Diamond and his gaggle of right-wing loony internet acolytes, along with Manhattan Institute's Sol Stern and Fordham's Mike Petrilli, see the race. To the new-McCarthyite witch hunters, it's all about us '60s-era radicals and our undue influence over Barack Obama. Lord, if only it were true. Maybe Barack wouldn't be scrambling towards the center on issues of gun control and immunity for spying communications conglomerates.

To some of the low-life's (he even brings in our families, kids, etc....) charges, I plead guilty. I was indeed a militant young radical leader back then--head of SDS in '68 and then a Marxist revolutionary. We new leftists were indeed looking for answers and alternatives to both Soviet gulag socialism as well as to the Democratic Party's machine politics, war mongering and racial segregationist practices of the times.

That's me on the far right in '69. 

Quite naturally we looked to other '60s-era radicals (Che, Mao, Mandela, Ho Chi Minh, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King) for answers. Found some. Didn't find others. History and lots of hard debate and experience have moved me far from my politics of 30-40 years ago. But there is also much I've tried to hang on to--opposition to the war, support for union rights, involvement in the Civil Rights Movement and the struggle social justice and democratic education, to name a few.

It's that part of my history that led me to my last 30 years of work as an educator and school reform activist (yes, low-life Diamond, I actually was a cab driver--a damned good one). You'll have to read our book for more on that topic.

Most of the rest of the low-lifer stuff is crap, either badly researched or just fabricated--a throwback to the old '50 McCarthyite, guilt-by-association campaigns. Much of it doesn't even get my name right. They call me Martin.

I haven't had the time nor the inclination to google Diamond or look into his past. Don't know what his politics were 30 years ago. But I'll leave that to others.

In case you haven't noticed, this type of fear-based politics is a sign of the times. It even has Barack Obama putting on flag pins and vowing that he is truly patriotic over and over and over again. I really don't blame him, especially after hearing Matt Lauer accidentally referring to him, once again, as "Osama" yesterday morning.

Among the crap is the claim that Obama threw me "under the bus" by censoring my educators blog on the Obama campaign website. The fact is, I have great difficulty managing even one blog, hadn't posted on the Obama site for weeks and then found the site filled with racist comments and even threats of violence, posted by the low-lifes. So I closed it down. Actually, I and anyone, can post on that blog site. There is no screening. No controls. That, to the campaign's credit. Doing the SmallTalk blog with its 30,000 readers each month, is more than enough for a small-time blogger like me.

The rest of his "evidence" of the Klonsky/Ayers/Hayden/Rudd/Davidson/Obama conspiracy is really too silly to deserve a response (Obama gave me $175,000--I wish. Must be mixing me up with Hillary).

But anyway, there it is. This election is all about ME. So remember, when you go to the polls in November, a vote for Obama is a vote for ME (and you). Now watch ME (us) kick McCain's butt.

*****

Darn that Leo Casey at Edwize. He spoils everything by taking on Diamond's claim that the election is all about ME. Casey first makes sure that no one thinks him a weatherman terrorist nor a Maoist. Hey, does this imply that Casey and the UFT are supporting Obama? He's yet to say so, but this post hints at it. Kudos to you for that Leo. But Casey's blog also has provided a platform for low-life Diamond and he never even criticizes him directly. Even as Diamond takes him to task for being a naive conciliator.

Instead Leo writes:

A sure sign that the 2008 election is shaping up to be a realigning election, decisively ending three decades of conservative dominance of American politics, is the declining quality of argument put forward by the Right. This is particularly true in the field of education, where right-wing education pundits are reduced to complaining about the long-dead political pasts of two Chicago-based Obama education supporters.

How right you are Mr. Casey.

Leo then argues the right also has its own '60s radical, Howard Fuller, in its ranks. So there. Take that you Republicans.

I'm still trying to figure out how one's past can be described as "long-dead." I like to think of it as prologue.