tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post3055549493698465922..comments2023-12-24T05:39:44.753-06:00Comments on Mike Klonsky's Blog: Fighting the pissantsMike Klonskyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02017021676773731024noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-77331969363508989512010-09-07T13:29:32.743-05:002010-09-07T13:29:32.743-05:00Wow...this is fairly nasty stuff. Makes you wonde...Wow...this is fairly nasty stuff. Makes you wonder why blogging often gets such a bad rap. Some of this makes Fox looks like an objective balanced news source. Oh where's my EdWeek?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14872955924880056882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-69115483137427157132010-09-02T09:41:45.897-05:002010-09-02T09:41:45.897-05:00His intentions aren't good.His intentions aren't good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-74452087850865390102010-09-02T09:40:40.451-05:002010-09-02T09:40:40.451-05:00Gottlieb wrote in Huffington: But then "insid...Gottlieb wrote in Huffington: But then "insiders" like Klonsky make arguments so specious that it makes me think the more we know the better, even if the information is far from perfect. ...<br /><br />You know him no apology. He is a pissant.Pissant fighternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-47323340299685622632010-09-02T05:48:22.722-05:002010-09-02T05:48:22.722-05:00I agree with you, Mike. He's a pissant. Just l...I agree with you, Mike. He's a pissant. Just look at his actions. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck....<br /><br />TeacherRealityAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-90993796520266440892010-09-02T00:15:21.517-05:002010-09-02T00:15:21.517-05:00I have to point out that even if you don't giv...I have to point out that even if you don't give a crap about the well-being of the teachers, if these ARE decent teachers who are being shamed and possibly ruined based on the Times' attack, it's their students who will lose if they're hounded and shamed out of teaching. And of course, since everyone involved acknowledges that these measures are a badly flawed measure of teachers' abilities, yet uses them to attack and punish teachers just the same, it is quite likely that decent teachers will be hounded and shamed out of teaching. <br /><br />Quack.CarolineSFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-51297073644574951982010-09-01T23:04:52.203-05:002010-09-01T23:04:52.203-05:00Alan,
Now let me get this straight.
You, a media ...Alan,<br /><br />Now let me get this straight.<br />You, a media publisher, backed by a rich private foundation and a charter school association, launch an unprincipled attack on teachers. You call for debasing them by name in the mass media for no reason other than they may be teaching kids with low test scores (possibly for reasons associated more with poverty, health or poorly resourced schools than anything teachers can control). You do this even knowing that this process is at best, "imperfect" and that leading experts in the field have been harshly critical, not only of the unethical publication of individual names, but the entire value-added type of evaluation itself. You do this knowing full well that the consequences entail these teachers possibly losing badly-needed income, having their careers ruined, or even fired and jobless, with no income or health insurance for their families in this time of economic crisis. You then refer to these same teachers as "insiders" (a pejorative term in the world of ed politics). Having done all this, you then want to criticize me for referring to those like you and the Slate writer, Shafer as "pissants." <br /><br />OK, even given all the above, and because I'm bigger than that, I humbly apologize for my choice of words. I know it must hurt to be singled out like that in the public media. Forgive me.Mike Klonskynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-71522217551882059552010-09-01T21:30:56.798-05:002010-09-01T21:30:56.798-05:00Alan Gottlieb said:
I guess I'd better duck b...Alan Gottlieb said:<br /><br />I guess I'd better duck before taking the Klonsky name in vain.<br /><br />Yer damn skippy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-87049386996655640452010-09-01T21:27:04.615-05:002010-09-01T21:27:04.615-05:00Jem'e excuse. Duck not goose. But defending a ...Jem'e excuse. Duck not goose. But defending a practice and methodology you admit is flawed and punitive, while attacking those who oppose it. Ethics? Mon dieu! Can't one disagree with someone who has bad intentions?<br />Fred KlonskyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-8917877087669237672010-09-01T19:27:02.158-05:002010-09-01T19:27:02.158-05:00I don't really think canards trot; it's mo...I don't really think canards trot; it's more like a waddle.CarolineSFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-133521035538248322.post-38708118661794099222010-09-01T19:02:32.614-05:002010-09-01T19:02:32.614-05:00If my fancy Chicago private high school French (sa...If my fancy Chicago private high school French (same high school as Arne Duncan! Hyde Park turns out all these fascists, what gives??) serves, canard is duck, not goose. I guess I'd better duck before taking the Klonsky name in vain. Thanks for calling me an unethical pissant. Name-calling really elevates the debate. Since when does expressing one's opinion in an opinion piece constitute a breach of ethics? Is it possible for someone to disagree with you and still have good intentions? Just wondering.Alan Gottliebhttp://ednewscolorado.orgnoreply@blogger.com